+1 I find this weird too.

Le mardi 7 juin 2016, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> a écrit :

> +1 this notion that The way forward for the IGF should be discussed by a
> small elite group in isolation from the larger community is completely
> contrary to the model
>
> Bill
>
> Sent from my iPhone
>
> On 07 Jun 2016, at 02:00, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote:
>
> Thanks Avri. I don't see anything new there. But I don't understand the
> argument of we want to be a focussed small group brainstorming hence remote
> participation might not be possible and that they will look into it! It is
> not rocket science to do remote participation even for small brain storming
> groups! We have done break out sessions with online participants using
> Adobe at ICANN and other places. What is so difficult? Do they need an
> adobe license? They just have to make a couple of people among the nominees
> responsible for interacting with the remote participants and take
> responsibility for facilitating it. they are so eager to go there, why not
> take on some responsibility to include other people?
>
> On 7 June 2016 at 01:47, avri doria <[log in to unmask]
> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote:
>
>>
>> has not been commented on or reviewed by MAG yet.
>>
>>
>> -------- Forwarded Message --------
>> Subject:        [IGFmaglist] MAG Call with UNDESA/NY
>> Date:   Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:41:46 +0200
>> From:   Chengetai Masango <[log in to unmask]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>>
>> To:     IGF Maglist <[log in to unmask]
>> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>>
>>
>>
>>
>> Dear All,
>>
>> Please find attached the summary report of last weeks MAG call with
>> UNDESA/NY.
>>
>> Best regards,
>>
>> Chengetai
>>
>>
>>
>> ---
>> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software.
>> https://www.avast.com/antivirus
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Farzaneh
>
>