+1 I find this weird too. Le mardi 7 juin 2016, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> a écrit : > +1 this notion that The way forward for the IGF should be discussed by a > small elite group in isolation from the larger community is completely > contrary to the model > > Bill > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 07 Jun 2016, at 02:00, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote: > > Thanks Avri. I don't see anything new there. But I don't understand the > argument of we want to be a focussed small group brainstorming hence remote > participation might not be possible and that they will look into it! It is > not rocket science to do remote participation even for small brain storming > groups! We have done break out sessions with online participants using > Adobe at ICANN and other places. What is so difficult? Do they need an > adobe license? They just have to make a couple of people among the nominees > responsible for interacting with the remote participants and take > responsibility for facilitating it. they are so eager to go there, why not > take on some responsibility to include other people? > > On 7 June 2016 at 01:47, avri doria <[log in to unmask] > <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> wrote: > >> >> has not been commented on or reviewed by MAG yet. >> >> >> -------- Forwarded Message -------- >> Subject: [IGFmaglist] MAG Call with UNDESA/NY >> Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2016 23:41:46 +0200 >> From: Chengetai Masango <[log in to unmask] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> >> To: IGF Maglist <[log in to unmask] >> <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);>> >> >> >> >> Dear All, >> >> Please find attached the summary report of last weeks MAG call with >> UNDESA/NY. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Chengetai >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus >> > > > > -- > Farzaneh > >