Hi, Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's plan/rationale for secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity. The position I have taken personally is: - I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the current employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA employees that wish to the PTI. - with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I think that from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee reporting solely to the PTI board. - i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not ICANN. there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are treated well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem. The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part of the separability formula. avri -------- Forwarded Message -------- Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000 From: Yuko Green <[log in to unmask]> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> Dear members of the IOTF, Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing recommendations we have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward to hearing any feedback you may have. Regards, *Yuko Green* Strategic Programs Manager Global Domains Division Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693 Mobile: +1 310 745 1517 E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org/> --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus