+1. Conflict of interest needs to be more of a focus now. Stephanie On 2016-06-16 7:40, Carlos Raul Gutierrez wrote: > Dear Avri, > > I think that all PTI staff should AT LEAST be at arms length form GDD, > as basic good corporate governance practice. I don´t understand how > GDD staff can be the DNS TLD market maker, the RAA/RRA compliance > officer (as newly announced), and staff the PTI, all at the same time, > without risk of getting into conflicts of interest at some point. But > maybe we are talking about a very easy "clerical role" and everything > is covered by the new ACCT framework. Maybe you can enlighten me here. > > Cheers > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > ISOC Costa Rica Chapter > skype carlos.raulg > +506 8837 7176 > ________ > Apartado 1571-1000 > COSTA RICA > > On Wed, Jun 15, 2016 at 4:32 PM, avri doria <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > Hi, > > Would like to get the NCSG range of views on ICANN's > plan/rationale for > secondment of all PTI staff in perpetuity. > > The position I have taken personally is: > > - I accept that in the initial instance, in consideration of the > current > employees and of stability, it makes sense to second those IANA > employees that wish to the PTI. > > - with the exception of the PTI managerPresident (if they happen to be > the same person) who I feel might have a conflict of interest in terms > of ICANN the employer and PTI the fiduciary responsibility. I > think that > from day 0, this executive level employee should be a PTI employee > reporting solely to the PTI board. > > - i think that replacement staff should be employed by PTI and not > ICANN. there is an issue with having two sort of employees, those > seconded from day 0 and new employees, but as long as staff are > treated > well and equitably this shouldn't be a problem. > > The CWG proposal did not get into this, though I think many of us > thought at the time that PTI staff would be PTI employees as part > of the > separability formula. > > avri > > > > -------- Forwarded Message -------- > Subject: [IOTF] Rationale for PTI Staffing Recommendations > Date: Fri, 10 Jun 2016 17:05:05 +0000 > From: Yuko Green <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > > > > Dear members of the IOTF, > > > > Attached, please find the rationale for PTI staffing > recommendations we > have made in the PTI Implementation Approach document. We look forward > to hearing any feedback you may have. > > > > Regards, > > > > *Yuko Green* > > Strategic Programs Manager > > Global Domains Division > > Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) > > > > Direct Line: +1 310 578 8693 <tel:%2B1%20310%20578%208693> > > Mobile: +1 310 745 1517 <tel:%2B1%20310%20745%201517> > > E-mail: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> > <mailto:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > > www.icann.org <http://www.icann.org> <http://www.icann.org/> > > > > > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus > >