Dear Milton,
Thank you for proposing this draft, with which I also agree. I have started
a call for consensus on the PC and will let you know.
Best wishes,
Marilia

On Thu, Jul 7, 2016 at 4:06 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

> Marilia and member of NCSG and the policy committee:
>
>
>
> Here are my proposed comments. I think it would be much more effective if
> these comments were filed timely by NCSG rather than by me as an
> individual. Therefore I will refrain from filing them. If NCSG runs into a
> snag and is unable to do so, please warn me and I will file them
> individually.
>
>
>
> ====
>
> Comments of the NCSG on the Draft RZERC Charter
>
>
>
> The RZERC is a consultative committee with powers to
>
>  - Propose architectural and operational changes to the DNS root zone (RZ).
>
> - Engage expertise and conduct community consultations on RZ Evolution
>  issues
>
> - Consult with ICANN in the development of an RFP for RZ maintainer, and
> help evaluate proposals if needed
>
> - Initiate a public consultation process on operational and architectural
> changes that might impose potential risk to the security, stability, or
> resiliency of the root system
>
>
>
> With the exception of 2 minor changes, we approve of the purpose, scope
> and composition of the committee. The two changes are:
>
>
>
> 1) For the sake of clarity, and to avoid mission creep in the future, all
> references to the "root zone" should be modified to say "DNS root zone."
>
>
>
> 2) The composition of the RZERC excludes end users. We recommend the
> addition of one representative from the NCPH of the GNSO.
>