Hi All, In today's NCSG Policy Call, we discussed the GAC Communique. I recommended a response to item #2 on the Proxy-Privacy Accreditation WG Recommendations based on the 10,000+ public comments the Working Group received and the very difficult issues it weighed. On seeing the "GNSO Review of GAC Communique - Helsinki" that Carlos circulated (tx you, Carlos!), I want to share that it is measured and balanced -- and very diplomatic. Best, Kathy On 7/19/2016 1:12 PM, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote: > FYI, based on our discussion this morning > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > Forwarded message: > >> From: Marika Konings <[log in to unmask]> >> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> >> Subject: [council] For your review - draft GNSO Review of the >> Helsinki GAC Communique >> Date: Tue, 19 Jul 2016 16:57:21 +0000 >> >> Dear All, >> >> Please find attached for your review and consideration the proposed >> GNSO Review of the Helsinki GAC Communique as developed by the >> volunteers identified during the wrap up session (James, Donna and >> Heather). Recognizing the short time available for review, the GNSO >> leadership team realizes that it may not be possible to approve the >> entire response, but they request that you specifically focus on item >> 2 (Privacy & Proxy) as that is the most time sensitive topic with >> Board consideration expected possibly later this month. >> >> Best regards, >> >> Marika >> >> Marika Konings >> Senior Policy Director & Team Leader for the GNSO, Internet >> Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) >> Email: [log in to unmask]<mailto:[log in to unmask]> >> >> Follow the GNSO via Twitter @ICANN_GNSO >> Find out more about the GNSO by taking our interactive >> courses<http://learn.icann.org/courses/gnso> and visiting the GNSO >> Newcomer >> pages<http://gnso.icann.org/sites/gnso.icann.org/files/gnso/presentations/policy-efforts.htm#newcomers>. >>