Hi Vidushi, Excellent work, thank you again for doing all of this ! Michael and I both left some comments. But it is mostly in phrasing and not in content. Best, On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 11:43 AM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear All, > > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at > this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7- > KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing > > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific > questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses > over arching human rights concerns. > > I look forward to your feedback and comments. > > Best, > > Vidushi > > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] > wrote: > > > Hi Niels, > > > > I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did > > not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working > > Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind > > enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG > > participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- > > even a little late! > > > > But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer > > vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for > > comment would enable more people to participate. > > > > Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, > > > > Kathy > > > > > > On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > >> Dear all, > >> > >> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive > >> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the > >> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority > >> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from > >> the global south, etc). > >> > >> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is > >> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be > >> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. > >> > >> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the > >> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document > [0]. > >> > >> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on > >> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to > >> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so > >> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) > >> > >> All the best, > >> > >> Niels > >> > >> [0] > >> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/ > 4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate= > 1467180138000&api=v2 > >> > >> > >> > >> > >> > -- Corinne J.N. Cath