We are also free to challenge any decision the EC makes with 15 member signatures. avri On 22-Aug-16 12:54, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > On Mon, Aug 22, 2016 at 12:43:41PM -0400, avri doria ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > >> On 22-Aug-16 12:33, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: >>> I do see some people want to be able to cast negative votes so to >>> speak and think NOTA is the way it could be done, but I don't agree >>> with that. >> That is the way it has been done until now. > It has? I don't think NOTA has ever won, so there's no real precedent, > nor am I aware of any documented decision to that effect either. > Feel free to correct me if I'm wrong. > >>> But we're presently discussing this in NCSG EC and if it decides >>> that new ballots need to be issued, we will do that. >> As long as the NCSG body politic agrees, that is. > "The NCSG body politic" is no decision-making body. Nor is this list. > > Appealing to the membership at large can only be formally done by > a vote. Perhaps we vote on how the election is done. :-) > > Given the timing, I suggest an easy way to do it: > > Everybody: if you think I'm in the wrong here, vote NotA for Chair. > If I lose to NotA I will accept my defeat and call for a new election. > > You are of course also welcome to challenge the election in any > other way as well, if you so choose. > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus