Hi Niels, I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- even a little late! But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for comment would enable more people to participate. Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, Kathy On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > Dear all, > > I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive > call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the > gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority > procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from > the global south, etc). > > I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is > over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be > considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. > > Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the > report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. > > So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on > Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to > submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so > you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) > > All the best, > > Niels > > [0] > https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 > > > > > >