Dear All, Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over arching human rights concerns. I look forward to your feedback and comments. Best, Vidushi ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote: > Hi Niels, > > I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did > not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working > Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind > enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG > participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- > even a little late! > > But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer > vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for > comment would enable more people to participate. > > Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, > > Kathy > > > On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >> Dear all, >> >> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority >> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >> the global south, etc). >> >> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >> >> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. >> >> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >> >> All the best, >> >> Niels >> >> [0] >> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 >> >> >> >> >>