+1 Norbert On 8/22/2016 11:45 PM, William Drake wrote: > Mr. T, > >> On Aug 22, 2016, at 18:33, Tapani Tarvainen >> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> In most elections there's no way to explicitly vote *against* someone >> in any other way than by not voting for them - you can only explicitly >> vote *for* someone. And I think that's the way it should be. > > In most elections worth a damn there are competing candidates so it’s > not an issue. In a noncompetitive election, it is reasonable to > suggest that people should have some sort of a choice to meaningfully > express their preferences. If the only choice is to accept or reject > a whole group of noncompeting candidates it is an especially strange > election. I already voted but think there’s a governance issue that > merits consideration. > > cheers > > Bill