Avri & "The Group of 21" There has been a lot of back and forth about what exactly is being done wrong, or being done right, in this election process. In your appeal you write: /"Without any notice to the membership or the Executive Committee, the NCSG Chair changed// //the longstanding interpretation of the election rules, causing confusion among the membership// //once the ballot was released"// / I agree that there is much confusion so could you expand on your appeal and spell out in a few words what exactly what the longstanding interpretation and what change violated that interpretation. I am not asking about the merits of either approach, only for clarity about the nature of the change. Sam L. NPOC/csih On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote: > NCSG colleagues, > > *Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members > signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC > decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the > election process before proceeding.* > > Thank you, > > Avri Doria > > on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal* > *** >