Avri & "The Group of 21"
There has been a lot of back and forth about what exactly is being
done wrong, or being done right,
in this election process. In your appeal you write:
"Without any notice to the membership or the Executive
Committee, the NCSG Chair changed
the longstanding interpretation of the election rules,
causing confusion among the membership
once the ballot was released"
I agree that there is much confusion so could you expand on your
appeal and spell out in a few words
what exactly what the longstanding interpretation and what change
violated that interpretation.
I am not asking about the merits of either approach, only for
clarity about the nature of the change.
Sam L. NPOC/csih
On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote:
[log in to unmask]"
type="cite">
NCSG colleagues,
*Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members
signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC
decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the
election process before proceeding.*
Thank you,
Avri Doria
on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal*
***