Hi, I do not know. There was outreach by many of the people who signed among their contacts. We needed to reach 15 for the purposes of a charter appeal. Personally at the NCSG level I just look for NCSG membership since members can be part of none, one or more constituencies. Also while the EC that must handle this has constituency based composition, this is a NCSG appeal that is based solely on NCSG membership. Having said that, I would be happy to have NPOC members join in the appeal. Avri On 23-Aug-16 10:56, Klaus Stoll wrote: > Dear Avri > > Greetings and Thanks for this. I hope this is the right way to clarify > the situation. Don't know but we will see. > > Can I ask you which NPOC members have been consulted by the group that > initiated this appeal as I note the absence of NPOC members in the > group of signatures? > > Yours > > Klaus > > > On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote: >> NCSG colleagues, >> >> *Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members >> signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC >> decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the >> election process before proceeding.* >> >> Thank you, >> >> Avri Doria >> >> on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal* >> *** >> >> >> >> --- >> This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. >> https://www.avast.com/antivirus > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus