Avri & "The Group of 21"
There has been a lot of back and forth about what exactly is being done wrong, or being done right,
in this election process. In your appeal you write:
"Without any notice to the membership or the Executive Committee, the NCSG Chair changed
the longstanding interpretation of the election rules, causing confusion among the membership
once the ballot was released"
I agree that there is much confusion so could you expand on your appeal and spell out in a few words
what exactly what the longstanding interpretation and what change violated that interpretation.
I am not asking about the merits of either approach, only for clarity about the nature of the change.
Sam L. NPOC/csih
On 8/23/2016 10:44 AM, avri doria wrote:
NCSG colleagues, *Pursuant to Section 2.4.2.1 of NCSG’s Charter, the NCSG Members signed***in the enclosed***hereby initiate an appeal of the NCSG EC decision to refuse to fix the contested ballots and properly clarify the election process before proceeding.* Thank you, Avri Doria on behalf of the 21 members who signed the appeal* ***