+1 @Sam. +1 @Seun. The quicker de réaction the more it'll be great. Le 3 août 2016 21:58, "Wisdom Donkor" <[log in to unmask]> a écrit : > 100% in agreement with Sam. > > On Wednesday, August 3, 2016, Seun Ojedeji <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Well said Sam, and I agree 100% with your last two paragraphs. WS2 has > commenced and I urge you to re-echo this within the group that will discuss > this topic early enough. > > > > The earlier we get a clear direction on some of these issues the more we > save on legal hours. > > > > Regards > > > > Sent from my LG G4 > > Kindly excuse brevity and typos > > > > On 3 Aug 2016 8:27 p.m., "Sam Lanfranco" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > >> > >> I have stayed relatively quiet in the ICANN and Human Rights (HR) > discussion. I will make my position known here, in very brief language, not > so much as to record my position but to bring some perspective to the > possible way forward. > >> > >> ICANN is a not-for-profit entity pledged to operate in the public > interest. It goes without saying that this includes respect for Human > Rights, but it may be worth having ICANN say it on the record, but leave it > to others to judge ICANN’s record with regard to Human Rights. > >> > >> What do I mean by that? What do I suggest? My thinking is that ICANN > can pledge to consider the Human Rights aspects of all of its DNS Internet > governance policies and implementation, but (BIG BUT) ICANN stops short of > incorporating anything like a Human Rights check list, a Human Rights score > card, or internal ICANN human rights performance monitoring, as it pursues > policy development. Leave that to constituencies as they struggle within > the multistakeholder policy development process, and leave the assessments > of ICANN’s record to outside third parties for whom Human Rights are > central to their own mission, vision and remit. > >> > >> Why do I suggest this split between an ICANN pledge and outside > monitoring? There is a legitimate fear that internalizing the monitoring > process would malfunction at several levels. It could become unwieldy, it > could become time consuming, it could become self-serving, and it could > become a venue for proxy fights around other issues. Let ICANN and its > multistakeholder policy making process, and its organizational > implementation processes, be open and transparent, and let’s hold ICANN > accountable on the Human Rights front by assessing it from outside ICANN. > >> > >> This should not be a struggle over whether Human Rights are in or out > of ICANN. > >> > >> Sam L. NPOC/CSIH > >> > >> -- > >> ------------------------------------------------ > >> "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured > >> in an unjust state" -Confucius > >> 邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也 > >> ------------------------------------------------ > >> Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar) > >> Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3 > >> email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco > >> blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com > >> Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852 > > > > -- > *WISDOM DONKOR (S/N Eng.)* > E-government and Open Government Data Platforms Specialist > National Information Technology Agency (NITA)/ > Ghana Open Data Initiative Project. > ICANN Fellow / Member, UN IGF MAG Member, ISOC Member, > Freedom Online Coalition (FOC) Member, Diplo Foundation Member, > OGP Open Data WG Member, GODAN Memember, ITAG Member > Email: [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > [log in to unmask] > Skype: wisdom_dk > facebook: facebook@wisdom_dk > Website: www.nita.gov.gh / www.data.gov.gh > www.isoc.gh / www.itag.org.gh > >