+1 On 16-Aug-16 17:54, Mamadou LO wrote: > My support to this. Resumes can really help know more on candidates. > Good idea. > Mamadou > > > Envoyé depuis mon smartphone Samsung Galaxy. > > > -------- Message d'origine -------- > De : Robin Gross <[log in to unmask]> > Date : 16/08/2016 21:41 (GMT+00:00) > À : [log in to unmask] > Objet : Re: Perrin Candidate Statement > > Agreed. It is important for members to become more acquainted with > our representatives and resumes are extremely helpful for that. > > Thanks, > Robin > >> On Aug 16, 2016, at 2:33 PM, matthew shears <[log in to unmask] >> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> >> I'd like to support this suggestion and ask that all candidates >> provide their resumes. >> >> Thanks James. >> >> >> On 16/08/2016 22:16, James Gannon wrote: >>> Hey Stephanie, >>> >>> Actually that’s a really good idea on resumes, would like to see the >>> candidates share these as its a critical part of the skill set that >>> they are brining to the table. >>> Particularly useful for our members who may not know the candidates >>> personally. >>> >>> -James >>> >>> From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Stephanie >>> Perrin <[log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>> Reply-To: Stephanie Perrin <[log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>> Date: Tuesday 16 August 2016 at 21:57 >>> To: "[log in to unmask] >>> <mailto:[log in to unmask]>" >>> <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> >>> Subject: Perrin Candidate Statement >>> >>> Attached is my candidate statement in Word, also copied below. I >>> fear not much has changed since my statement in 2014....in >>> particular I would have hoped that my dissertation would have been >>> finished!! Soon though....:-) >>> >>> My resume is available to anyone who is interested. >>> >>> Best regards >>> >>> Stephanie Perrin >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> *Name:* Stephanie Perrin >>> *Region of residence:* Canada, North America >>> *Gender:* female >>> *Employment: * PhD candidate, retired federal public servant >>> *Conflicts of Interest: * none that I am aware of >>> *Reasons for willingness to take on the position:* >>> My candidate statement has not really changed from what I submitted >>> in 2014. I still believe that ICANN is a wonderful experiment in >>> multistakeholder management of a key resource. I still want it to >>> work, but after two years of hard work on Council and various PDPs I >>> understand the threats and challenges better. I believe that my >>> experience and knowledge can be useful at ICANN. I am a hard worker >>> and a passionate advocate, and I would like to try to make a >>> difference here. There is a great team at NCSG, many different >>> characters with all kinds of talents and skills, and I would be >>> proud to represent them and the non-commercial users we all >>> represent at the GNSO. I have a lot of international experience, I >>> understand key stakeholders like the GAC, and I would love the >>> challenge of trying to help find solutions for some of the policy >>> and procedural issues with which the GNSO struggles. >>> >>> *Qualifications for the position:* >>> I have spent 30 years in the Canadian federal government, most of it >>> in the Department of Communications and the Department of Industry, >>> in the areas of telecom policy, and international trade in >>> telecommunciations, media and broadcasting, and intellectual >>> property. I worked in Canada-US trade and technology impact >>> assessment, during the 90s when the Internet was developed, and have >>> broad experience working with governments on e-commence. I >>> represented Canada at the OECD working group on security and privacy >>> for ten years, and was a vice-chair of the group which developed >>> cryptography policy guidelines. During the 90s, I also worked for >>> ten years on Canada's privacy standard (CAN/CSA-Q830-96) and was >>> Director of Privacy Policy responsible for turning that standard >>> into Canada's private sector privacy law. After the law passed, I >>> took leave and went to work as Canada's first Chief Privacy Officer, >>> for Zero Knowledge Systems, a privacy enhancing technology company >>> that developed anonymous browsing and email software. I have also >>> worked, back in government, for six years in risk management, >>> integrity, and values and ethics. I also was Director of Research >>> and Policy at the federal Office of the Privacy Commissioner, and >>> worked to steer the office to examine Internet issues, including the >>> ICANN WHOIS issues of the day (2005-7). I have done a lot of public >>> speaking, and believe I can intervene effectively to represent you. >>> I am fluent in English and French. >>> >>> This experience is very relevant to the policy issues I see at >>> ICANN, for the following reasons: >>> ·ICANN is at an inflection point in terms of its maturity. It needs >>> to mature and develop better risk management, better accountability >>> and values and ethics, and better compliance with human rights law. >>> I think my practical government experience in these areas could be >>> useful. >>> ·There are serious privacy issues at ICANN, and a lack of >>> expertise. This is my principal area of expertise, and I have a >>> keen desire to contribute and to make things better. >>> ·During 2013-2014 I worked on the Experts Working Group on directory >>> services for new gTLDs, (WHOIS replacement) where I learned quite a >>> lot about the issues behind this key debate. I have now joined the >>> GNSO/RDS PDP where it is critical to have someone who understands >>> the EWG report, as it is clearly the template for future work. >>> ·During the past two years I worked on the working group on >>> accreditation of Privacy Proxy Services, and on the working group on >>> policy and implementation as well as the working group looking at >>> WHOIS conflicts with law.. I also worked on the GNSO Review team, >>> and prepared detailed comments on the outside examiners report. I >>> have monitored all the CCWG work on the IANA transition, and I >>> regularly review budget reports. >>> ·Again, my government policy and management experience, and the many >>> years that I have volunteered on standards development groups and >>> shadow groups have, I think, given me insight into these processes >>> that has proven useful. >>> *Statement of availability for the time the position required: * >>> I am no longer working fulltime, and my studies are focused on >>> issues related to ICANN. I therefore have abundant time to devote >>> to ICANN work, particularly the GNSO. Over the past two years I >>> have devoted approximately half my work week to ICANN. >>> >>> *Additional information: * >>> I am studying at the Information School of the University of >>> Toronto. I am writing my PhD dissertation on why ICANN has refused >>> to adopt privacy policy or law. I have spent my career either >>> applying law or developing solutions, including technology and law, >>> so my return to school is largely to satisfy that hunger to >>> understand things at a more theoretical level. I continue to work >>> to also fix that problem, and get some practical implementation of >>> commonly accepted privacy policies at ICANN. This is my focus in >>> much of the PDP work I have done, because there is a lot happening >>> on privacy issues, but it is certainly not my only area of >>> interest. It is important that we pace our work to avoid burnout, >>> but I am also keenly interested in attracting new talent to work at >>> ICANN, and in mentoring. >>> >>> Thanks for your attention. >>> Stephanie Perrin >> >> -- >> -------------- >> Matthew Shears >> Global Internet Policy and Human Rights >> Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) >> + 44 771 2472987 > --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus