+1 Farzi -Michael On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Thank you Vidushi and Niels, > > I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual > policies you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to > resolve the comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, > then resolve those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This > is what we did in the past and worked out well. > > Best > > Farzaneh > > On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > >> Hi Niels and all, >> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require >> further work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to >> the PC as it is. >> Thanks! >> Tatiana >> >> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < >> [log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, >>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? >>> >>> Best, >>> >>> Niels >>> >>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: >>> > Dear All, >>> > >>> > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure >>> WG at this link: https://docs.google.com/docume >>> nt/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing >>> > >>> > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and >>> specific questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only >>> discusses over arching human rights concerns. >>> > >>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments. >>> > >>> > Best, >>> > >>> > Vidushi >>> > >>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman >>> [log in to unmask] wrote: >>> > >>> >> Hi Niels, >>> >> >>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did >>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working >>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind >>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG >>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- >>> >> even a little late! >>> >> >>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer >>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week >>> for >>> >> comment would enable more people to participate. >>> >> >>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, >>> >> >>> >> Kathy >>> >> >>> >> >>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>> >>> Dear all, >>> >>> >>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community >>> priority >>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >>> >>> the global south, etc). >>> >>> >>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >>> >>> >>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR >>> document [0]. >>> >>> >>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >>> >>> >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> >>> >>> Niels >>> >>> >>> >>> [0] >>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4. >>> CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=146718 >>> 0138000&api=v2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Niels ten Oever >>> Head of Digital >>> >>> Article 19 >>> www.article19.org >>> >>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 >>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >>> >> >> > > > -- > Farzaneh >