Hi Niels and all,
some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require
further work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to
the PC as it is.
Thanks!
Tatiana

On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:

> Dear all,
>
> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people,
> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up?
>
> Best,
>
> Niels
>
> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote:
> > Dear All,
> >
> > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG
> at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-
> KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing
> >
> > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific
> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses
> over arching human rights concerns.
> >
> > I look forward to your feedback and comments.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Vidushi
> >
> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask]
> wrote:
> >
> >> Hi Niels,
> >>
> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did
> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working
> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind
> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG
> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment --
> >> even a little late!
> >>
> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer
> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for
> >> comment would enable more people to participate.
> >>
> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR,
> >>
> >> Kathy
> >>
> >>
> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote:
> >>> Dear all,
> >>>
> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive
> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the
> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority
> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from
> >>> the global south, etc).
> >>>
> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is
> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be
> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet.
> >>>
> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the
> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR
> document [0].
> >>>
> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on
> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to
> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so
> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :)
> >>>
> >>> All the best,
> >>>
> >>> Niels
> >>>
> >>> [0]
> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/
> 4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=
> 1467180138000&api=v2
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Niels ten Oever
> Head of Digital
>
> Article 19
> www.article19.org
>
> PGP fingerprint    8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4
>                    678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9
>