Hi Niels and all, some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it is. Thanks! Tatiana On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear all, > > This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, > perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? > > Best, > > Niels > > On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: > > Dear All, > > > > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG > at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7- > KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing > > > > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific > questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses > over arching human rights concerns. > > > > I look forward to your feedback and comments. > > > > Best, > > > > Vidushi > > > > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] > wrote: > > > >> Hi Niels, > >> > >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did > >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working > >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind > >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG > >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- > >> even a little late! > >> > >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer > >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for > >> comment would enable more people to participate. > >> > >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, > >> > >> Kathy > >> > >> > >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > >>> Dear all, > >>> > >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive > >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the > >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority > >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from > >>> the global south, etc). > >>> > >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is > >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be > >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. > >>> > >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the > >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR > document [0]. > >>> > >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on > >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to > >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so > >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) > >>> > >>> All the best, > >>> > >>> Niels > >>> > >>> [0] > >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/ > 4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate= > 1467180138000&api=v2 > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> > > -- > Niels ten Oever > Head of Digital > > Article 19 > www.article19.org > > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >