Dear All, I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion Farzi. Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th? That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating them. Best, Vidushi ----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > +1 Farzi > -Michael > On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] > > wrote: >> Thank you Vidushi and Niels, >> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies >> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the >> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve >> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in >> the past and worked out well. >> Best >> Farzaneh >> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] > >> wrote: >>> Hi Niels and all, >>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further >>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it >>> is. >>> Thanks! >>> Tatiana >>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] > >>> wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, >>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? >>>> Best, >>>> Niels >>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: >>>> > Dear All, >>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this >>>>> link: >>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing >>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific >>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over >>>> > arching human rights concerns. >>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments. >>>> > Best, >>>> > Vidushi >>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote: >>>> >> Hi Niels, >>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did >>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working >>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind >>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG >>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- >>>> >> even a little late! >>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer >>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for >>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate. >>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, >>>> >> Kathy >>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>>> >>> Dear all, >>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority >>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >>>> >>> the global south, etc). >>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. >>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >>>> >>> All the best, >>>> >>> Niels >>>> >>> [0] >>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 >>>> -- >>>> Niels ten Oever >>>> Head of Digital >>>> Article 19 >>>> www.article19.org >>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 >>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >> -- >> Farzaneh