Dear All, Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures WG: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#. All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee can pick this up now. Best wishes, Vidushi ----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Dear All, > I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion > Farzi. > Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th? > That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating > them. > Best, > Vidushi > ----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> +1 Farzi >> -Michael >> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] > >> wrote: >>> Thank you Vidushi and Niels, >>> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies >>> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the >>> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve >>> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in >>> the past and worked out well. >>> Best >>> Farzaneh >>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] > >>> wrote: >>>> Hi Niels and all, >>>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further >>>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it >>>> is. >>>> Thanks! >>>> Tatiana >>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] > >>>> wrote: >>>>> Dear all, >>>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, >>>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? >>>>> Best, >>>>> Niels >>>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: >>>>> > Dear All, >>>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this >>>>>> link: >>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific >>>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over >>>>> > arching human rights concerns. >>>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments. >>>>> > Best, >>>>> > Vidushi >>>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote: >>>>> >> Hi Niels, >>>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did >>>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working >>>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind >>>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG >>>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- >>>>> >> even a little late! >>>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer >>>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for >>>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate. >>>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, >>>>> >> Kathy >>>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>>>> >>> Dear all, >>>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >>>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >>>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority >>>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >>>>> >>> the global south, etc). >>>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >>>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >>>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >>>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >>>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. >>>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >>>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >>>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >>>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >>>>> >>> All the best, >>>>> >>> Niels >>>>> >>> [0] >>>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 >>>>> -- >>>>> Niels ten Oever >>>>> Head of Digital >>>>> Article 19 >>>>> www.article19.org >>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 >>>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >>> -- >>> Farzaneh