Dear Milton, Thanks for your comments. I have taken off the FCFS section and made it a comment for anyone who disagrees with this change. Some other comments that require a rewrite I have not resolved - I would ask you to edit the document directly as that would be most accurate. Thanks, Vidushi ----- On Sep 19, 2016, at 6:41 PM, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > I hope this is not the final version, it contain some sections that don't make > sense and need to be modified. > I have added some comments in the Google doc. In particular, I think we need to > delete altogether what is now section c), and probably also section d). > Neither of them make coherent points and they espouse positions which do not > have consensus support i n NCSG > From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask]> on behalf of Vidushi Marda > <[log in to unmask]> > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 3:32:06 AM > To: [log in to unmask] > Subject: [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD > subsequent procedure WG > Dear All, > Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures > WG: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#. > All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee > can pick this up now. > Best wishes, > Vidushi > From: [log in to unmask] > To: [log in to unmask] > Cc: [log in to unmask] > Sent: Monday, September 19, 2016 11:06:35 AM > Subject: Re: [Deadline for comments 9/9] Re: pre-warning draft comment to gTLD > subsequent procedure WG > Dear All, > Here is the final version of the NCSG comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedures > WG: > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit#. > All comments have been addressed and resolved. Hoping that the policy committee > can pick this up now. > Best wishes, > Vidushi > ----- On Sep 6, 2016, at 12:37 PM, Vidushi Marda <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> Dear All, >> I think the idea of deadlines for comments work well. Thanks for the suggestion >> Farzi. >> Can we make the last day for comments/feedback on the doc this Friday the 9th? >> That way we should be able to send in the doc by next week after incorporating >> them. >> Best, >> Vidushi >> ----- On Sep 5, 2016, at 7:01 AM, Michael Oghia <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >>> +1 Farzi >>> -Michael >>> On Sun, Sep 4, 2016 at 5:18 PM, farzaneh badii < [log in to unmask] > >>> wrote: >>>> Thank you Vidushi and Niels, >>>> I think your document will benefit from more referencing to the actual policies >>>> you are talking about. Also as Tatiana pointed out you need to resolve the >>>> comments first. I suggest set a deadline for people to comment, then resolve >>>> those comments and then send it out to policy committee. This is what we did in >>>> the past and worked out well. >>>> Best >>>> Farzaneh >>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:33, Tatiana Tropina < [log in to unmask] > >>>> wrote: >>>>> Hi Niels and all, >>>>> some of the comments in the google doc (e.g. Avri's comments) require further >>>>> work and/or clarification, don't think the document can be sent to the PC as it >>>>> is. >>>>> Thanks! >>>>> Tatiana >>>>> On 4 September 2016 at 14:30, Niels ten Oever < [log in to unmask] > >>>>> wrote: >>>>>> Dear all, >>>>>> This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, >>>>>> perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? >>>>>> Best, >>>>>> Niels >>>>>> On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: >>>>>> > Dear All, >>>>>>> Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this >>>>>>> link: >>>>>> > https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing >>>>>>> While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific >>>>>>> questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over >>>>>> > arching human rights concerns. >>>>>> > I look forward to your feedback and comments. >>>>>> > Best, >>>>>> > Vidushi >>>>>> > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote: >>>>>> >> Hi Niels, >>>>>> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did >>>>>> >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working >>>>>> >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind >>>>>> >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG >>>>>> >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- >>>>>> >> even a little late! >>>>>> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer >>>>>> >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for >>>>>> >> comment would enable more people to participate. >>>>>> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, >>>>>> >> Kathy >>>>>> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>>>>> >>> Dear all, >>>>>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >>>>>> >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >>>>>> >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority >>>>>> >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >>>>>> >>> the global south, etc). >>>>>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >>>>>> >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >>>>>> >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >>>>>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >>>>>> >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. >>>>>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >>>>>> >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >>>>>> >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >>>>>> >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >>>>>> >>> All the best, >>>>>> >>> Niels >>>>>> >>> [0] >>>>>> >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 >>>>>> -- >>>>>> Niels ten Oever >>>>>> Head of Digital >>>>>> Article 19 >>>>>> www.article19.org >>>>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 >>>>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >>>> -- >>>> Farzaneh