Dear all, This document has now been reviewed and commented on by several people, perhaps the policy committee can pick this up? Best, Niels On 08/30/2016 07:43 PM, Vidushi Marda wrote: > Dear All, > > Please find the first draft comment to the gTLD Subsequent Procedure WG at this link: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1c1IC7-KJz12XuDBFeEYiDMoh8I1ibks_McW0XqHh_nw/edit?usp=sharing > > While the request was extremely detailed with six subjects and specific questions under each, due to paucity of time, this draft only discusses over arching human rights concerns. > > I look forward to your feedback and comments. > > Best, > > Vidushi > > ----- On Aug 26, 2016, at 7:57 PM, Kathy Kleiman [log in to unmask] wrote: > >> Hi Niels, >> >> I think this idea is a very good one. I have been worried that we did >> not submit a comment to the New gTLD Subsequent Procedures Working >> Group, especially on Community Groups. A few weeks ago, Avri was kind >> enough to answer my questions about this, and encourage our NCSG >> participation. I think it is the perfect time to submit a comment -- >> even a little late! >> >> But quick note, at least in the US, next week is big end of summer >> vacation week and traditionally very quiet. Perhaps allowing a week for >> comment would enable more people to participate. >> >> Best and tx to you, Vidushi and the CCWP HR, >> >> Kathy >> >> >> On 8/26/2016 7:50 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: >>> Dear all, >>> >>> I hope this e-mail finds you all well. We just had a very productive >>> call of the CCWP HR in which we discussed several issues in which the >>> gTLD Subsequenty Procedures WG impacts human rights (community priority >>> procedure, how 'community' is defined, lack of gTLD applications from >>> the global south, etc). >>> >>> I am aware that the first official input/comment period of this WG is >>> over, but I think if we would send something in it might still be >>> considered, especially since the NCSG did not send comment yet. >>> >>> Vidushi has graciously offered to do the drafting, also based on the >>> report she initially drafted and which was accepted as CCWP HR document [0]. >>> >>> So this is an early warning that you'll receive a draft comment on >>> Tuesday, if we want to it to be considered I think we would need to >>> submit it rather switfly, that's why I am sending this pre-warning so >>> you know you can excpect it. Stay tuned :) >>> >>> All the best, >>> >>> Niels >>> >>> [0] >>> https://community.icann.org/download/attachments/53772653/4.CCWP-HR%20Jurisdiction.pdf?version=1&modificationDate=1467180138000&api=v2 >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- Niels ten Oever Head of Digital Article 19 www.article19.org PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9