I'd like to join the list too if such is created. Has there already been a
reasoning for/against Single Transferable Vote (SVT)? It gives great voter
satisfaction and discourages tactical voting.

maanantai 5. syyskuuta 2016 Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti:

> +1
>
> Now is the time to resolve the election issues, while the topic is bright
> in our minds.  Let's not put it on the back burner, but instead push
> through and find the consensus.  We've already had several suggestions
> about how to fix the process, let's continue exploring.
>
> One suggestion that was made was to have a No vote for each candidate in
> multiple-winner races.  There was multiple support for that, but also a
> suggestion that that was not sufficient even so.  Let's continue the
> discussion.
>
> Dan
>
>
> On 9/5/16 12:32 AM, dorothy g wrote:
>
>> Congrats to all!  and finally we can get to work on fixing our election
>> regulations so that we can have peaceful and transparent elections next
>> time around
>>
>>

-- 
Joonas "JoonasD6" Mäkinen
www.joonasmakinen.com

Vice Chairperson (international affairs), Pirate Youth of Finland,
www.piraattinuoret.fi
Vice Chairperson, Alternative Party, www.altparty.org

Faculty of Medicine +
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science
University of Helsinki

mobile +358 40 700 5190
Facebook, Twitter, G+, Skype, IRC, Steam: JoonasD6