I'd like to join the list too if such is created. Has there already been a reasoning for/against Single Transferable Vote (SVT)? It gives great voter satisfaction and discourages tactical voting. maanantai 5. syyskuuta 2016 Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti: > +1 > > Now is the time to resolve the election issues, while the topic is bright > in our minds. Let's not put it on the back burner, but instead push > through and find the consensus. We've already had several suggestions > about how to fix the process, let's continue exploring. > > One suggestion that was made was to have a No vote for each candidate in > multiple-winner races. There was multiple support for that, but also a > suggestion that that was not sufficient even so. Let's continue the > discussion. > > Dan > > > On 9/5/16 12:32 AM, dorothy g wrote: > >> Congrats to all! and finally we can get to work on fixing our election >> regulations so that we can have peaceful and transparent elections next >> time around >> >> -- Joonas "JoonasD6" Mäkinen www.joonasmakinen.com Vice Chairperson (international affairs), Pirate Youth of Finland, www.piraattinuoret.fi Vice Chairperson, Alternative Party, www.altparty.org Faculty of Medicine + Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science University of Helsinki mobile +358 40 700 5190 Facebook, Twitter, G+, Skype, IRC, Steam: JoonasD6