I'd like to join the list too if such is created. Has there already been a reasoning for/against Single Transferable Vote (SVT)? It gives great voter satisfaction and discourages tactical voting.
maanantai 5. syyskuuta 2016 Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti:
+1
Now is the time to resolve the election issues, while the topic is bright in our minds. Let's not put it on the back burner, but instead push through and find the consensus. We've already had several suggestions about how to fix the process, let's continue exploring.
One suggestion that was made was to have a No vote for each candidate in multiple-winner races. There was multiple support for that, but also a suggestion that that was not sufficient even so. Let's continue the discussion.
Dan
On 9/5/16 12:32 AM, dorothy g wrote:
Congrats to all! and finally we can get to work on fixing our election regulations so that we can have peaceful and transparent elections next time around
--
Joonas "JoonasD6" Mäkinen
www.joonasmakinen.com
Vice Chairperson (international affairs), Pirate Youth of Finland, www.piraattinuoret.fi
Vice Chairperson, Alternative Party, www.altparty.org
Faculty of Medicine +
Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science
University of Helsinki
mobile +358 40 700 5190
Facebook, Twitter, G+, Skype, IRC, Steam: JoonasD6