I'd also like to be on the list, if it is created. Joonas, I have made the case for a Proportional Representation (PR) method to be used, and STV (a PR method) would be an improvement over the current approach, I think. Reweighted Range Voting (RRV) is another worthy option. Neal McBurnett http://neal.mcburnett.org/ On Wed, Sep 07, 2016 at 12:09:32PM +0300, Joonas Mäkinen wrote: > I'd like to join the list too if such is created. Has there already been a reasoning for/against Single Transferable Vote (SVT)? It > gives great voter satisfaction and discourages tactical voting. > > maanantai 5. syyskuuta 2016 Dan Krimm <[log in to unmask]> kirjoitti: > > +1 > > Now is the time to resolve the election issues, while the topic is bright in our minds. Let's not put it on the back burner, > but instead push through and find the consensus. We've already had several suggestions about how to fix the process, let's > continue exploring. > > One suggestion that was made was to have a No vote for each candidate in multiple-winner races. There was multiple support for > that, but also a suggestion that that was not sufficient even so. Let's continue the discussion. > > Dan > > > On 9/5/16 12:32 AM, dorothy g wrote: > > Congrats to all! and finally we can get to work on fixing our election regulations so that we can have peaceful and > transparent elections next time around > > > > > -- > Joonas "JoonasD6" Mäkinen > www.joonasmakinen.com > > Vice Chairperson (international affairs), Pirate Youth of Finland, www.piraattinuoret.fi > Vice Chairperson, Alternative Party, www.altparty.org > > Faculty of Medicine + > Department of Mathematics and Statistics, Faculty of Science > University of Helsinki > > mobile +358 40 700 5190 > Facebook, Twitter, G+, Skype, IRC, Steam: JoonasD6