I curious Sam as to why you want to review. Full context, of course, is that I’m part of a large organization. But if you change the rules, I am quite certain I can get more than 4 (many more than 4) individuals from the organization to sign up. And that’s also true, I’m sure of the other organizations, including some of those I often disagree with. The 4N limit is kind of a cap on a registration arms race …
Paul
Paul Rosenzweig
O: +1 (202) 547-0660
M: +1 (202) 329-9650
VOIP: +1 (202) 738-1739
My PGP Key: http://redbranchconsulting.com/who-we-are/public-pgp-key/
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of Sam Lanfranco
Sent: Wednesday, September 7, 2016 11:19 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Re: Detailed election results
There was a maximum of 349 votes registered based on 247 ballots counted.
That means that there were 102 “extra votes” from voters with multiple voting rights.
A third or more of the votes cast were based on extra voting rights.
I would hope that the issue of multiple voting rights is also reviewed.
As well, a pointer to where the rules for multiple voting rights are listed,
and how organizational size is determined, and monitored, would be useful.
That would assist the rest of us in developing an informed opinion here.
Is there a location on the ICANN or NCSG websites that discloses who,
representing what organizations, has multiple voting rights?
----------------------------------------------------------
Total Ballots Cast (including duplicates): 282
Ballots Counted (excluding duplicates): 247
Voters Who Haven't Voted: 76
--------------------------------------------------------
Sam Lanfranco