Thanks Sam and hi all. I was actually tthinking on sighting Rafik email also that we may need to be strategic about this review and probably structure a date for each subgroup, even though we may have a subcommittee each to enable members which cut across to take in each as much as they can. For instance, NPOC can have a dateline of 30 Sept to conclude its revision then followed by NCSG and NCUC with two weeks interval. These I think will enable us to not only be active but also avoid unnecessary mixup they may arise when every subgroup. Just a few points Remmy Nweke On Tuesday, September 13, 2016, Sam Lanfranco <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > NCSG Colleagues > > I strongly endorse this move to review and update the NPOC Charter. Since > when, on behalf of my organization, I joined NPOC in 2014 there have been > substantive issues both within the NPOC charter, and between the NPOC, NCUC > and NCSG charters that are in need of review. One, in particular, for NPOC, > has to do with the criteria for membership from within the not-for-profit > and civil society organizations constituency. There are conflicts between > the NCSG and NPOC charters on that matter. > > As for a formal process for tracking revisions across NPOC, NCSG and NCUC > I would suggest that NPOC consider proposing a 2 or 3 person committee > responsible for collaboration in communications that keep each of the > efforts informed on what is going on in the other two charter revisions. I > say 2 or 3 since that small group could be one NPOC member and one NCUC > member who also are engaged in the NCSG revision, or possibly a third > member who is only an NCSG member. I look forward to the ideas of others. > > Sam L. > > *On 9/13/2016 11:19 AM, Klaus Stoll wrote:* > > *Dear NCSG Members * > > *I just want you to know that NPOC has also started the process of its > charter revision. We will inform you about the details soonest. * > > *I think that the charters of NCUC, NPOC and the NCSG are interdependent. > It is good that NCUC and NPOC have started the process. I think it would be > great if NCSG would start the process too and that we will find some formal > arrangements so that the different review teams talk and co-ordinate with > each others. If you have any suggestions in regard to establish > co-ordination, let's hear it. * > > *Yours * > > *Klaus * > > > > -- > ------------------------------------------------ > "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured > in an unjust state" -Confucius > 邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也 > ------------------------------------------------ > Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar) > Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3 > email: [log in to unmask] <javascript:_e(%7B%7D,'cvml',[log in to unmask]);> Skype: slanfranco > blog: http://samlanfranco.blogspot.com > Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852 > > -- Remmy Nweke, Esq lead strategist/group executive editor, DigitalSENSE Africa Media Ltd, publishers of: [DigitalSENSE Business News | ITRealms | NaijaAgroNet] Block F1, Shop 133 Moyosore Aboderin Plaza Bolade Junction, Oshodi, Lagos-Nigeria 234-8023122558, 8051000475, 08033592762, 08172004283 [log in to unmask]