Can I please ask our GNSO Councillors to outline their position on the attached motion? I find it rather shocking and my initial reaction is that I hope the motion does not pass, but perhaps you can persuade me otherwise... Thanks. Ayden Férdeline [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN Local Time: 27 October 2016 2:18 PM UTC Time: 27 October 2016 13:18 From: [log in to unmask] To: Nigel Hickson <[log in to unmask]> Dear members of the CCWG-IG, I want to share this motion that has been put forward to the next GNSO council meeting which will take place during the ICANN57 meeting. Best regards Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) Forwarded message: > From: Darcy Southwell <[log in to unmask]> > To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]> > Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering > Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet > governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN > Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:56:30 -0700 > > Dear Councilors, > > Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering > Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet > governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council > meeting. > > Best, > > Darcy > > __________ > > Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer > > M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart _______________________________________________ ccwg-internet-governance mailing list [log in to unmask] https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance