+ 1

On 19/10/2016 17:12, William Drake wrote:

Hi

You might consider combining 1 and 3 somehow, otherwise 2 of our 3 topics are focused on nailing the same person, who they’re doubling down on. Could be awkward and set teeth on edge.

Another option would be to ask about Goran’s “new narrative” that he’ll have rolled out by, ask about costs/benefits of a tripartite community/board/organization formulation….

Bill

On Oct 19, 2016, at 17:29, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

1. The new "complaint" system, which puts ICANN's lawyer (whose job is to protect the corporation from complainers whether they are right or wrong) in charge of managing complaints. Also affects the independence of the Ombudsman in unclear ways

2. The "small group" that is trying to develop policy for IGO names outside of ICANN's bottom up and representative policy processes.

3. Why there were no repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot Registry case. Indeed, the person responsible seems to have been promoted.

-----Original Message-----
From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]SYR.EDU] On Behalf
Of Tapani Tarvainen
Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:30 AM
To: [log in to unmask]
Subject: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad?

Dear all,

As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our meeting with
them in Hyderabad.

Suggestions?

--
Tapani Tarvainen

--
--------------
Matthew Shears
Global Internet Policy and Human Rights
Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT)
+ 44 771 2472987