Thanks James Anyone know if thee was a recording or something of this event. How come it seems that there is very little info sharing on this eventual WG? Don't we have reps? Matthew On 19/10/2016 18:09, James Gannon wrote: > https://gnso.icann.org/mailing-lists/archives/council/msg19277.html > > _Looks like that CCWG is kicking __off soon._ > > From: NCSG-Discuss <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> on behalf of Ayden Férdeline > <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Reply-To: Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Date: Wednesday 19 October 2016 at 18:06 > To: "[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>" <[log in to unmask] > <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> > Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad? > > Hi all, > > I agree with Bill that we should try to blend questions 1 and 3 > together. I would also like to know how the Board envisions the new > gTLD contention set auction proceeds being spent... There's now US$240 > million "reserved and earmarked until the Board determines a plan for > the appropriate use of the funds through consultation with the > community". So what's the plan, I wonder? We've been talking about a > charter for a CCWG on this topic since at least the Marrakech meeting, > maybe longer... There's a lot of cash in there now - would be great to > know at a high level how new Board members envision it being allocated. > > Ayden > > >> -------- Original Message -------- >> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad? >> Local Time: 19 October 2016 5:12 PM >> UTC Time: 19 October 2016 16:12 >> From: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >> To: [log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >> >> Hi >> >> You might consider combining 1 and 3 somehow, otherwise 2 of our 3 >> topics are focused on nailing the same person, who they’re doubling >> down on. Could be awkward and set teeth on edge. >> >> Another option would be to ask about Goran’s “new narrative” that >> he’ll have rolled out by, ask about costs/benefits of a tripartite >> community/board/organization formulation…. >> >> Bill >> >> > On Oct 19, 2016, at 17:29, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]>> wrote: >> > >> > 1. The new "complaint" system, which puts ICANN's lawyer (whose job is to protect the corporation from >> complainers whether they are right or wrong) in charge of managing >> complaints. Also affects the independence of the Ombudsman in unclear >> ways >> > >> > 2. The "small group" that is trying to develop policy for IGO names outside of ICANN's bottom up and representative >> policy processes. >> > >> > 3. Why there were no repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot Registry case. >> Indeed, the person responsible seems to have been promoted. >> > >> >> -----Original Message----- >> >> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >> >> Of Tapani Tarvainen >> >> Sent: Wednesday, October 19, 2016 8:30 AM >> >> To:[log in to unmask] <mailto:[log in to unmask]> >> >> Subject: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad? >> >> >> >> Dear all, >> >> >> >> As usual the board wants in advance topics or questions for our meeting with >> >> them in Hyderabad. >> >> >> >> Suggestions? >> >> >> >> -- >> >> Tapani Tarvainen > -- -------------- Matthew Shears Global Internet Policy and Human Rights Center for Democracy & Technology (CDT) + 44 771 2472987 --- This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. https://www.avast.com/antivirus