Can I please ask our GNSO Councillors to outline their position on the attached motion? I find it rather shocking and my initial reaction is that I hope the motion does not pass, but perhaps you can persuade me otherwise... Thanks.

Ayden Férdeline

linkedin.com/in/ferdeline

-------- Original Message --------

Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

Local Time: 27 October 2016 2:18 PM

UTC Time: 27 October 2016 13:18

From: [log in to unmask]

To: Nigel Hickson <ccwg-internet-governance@icann.org>

Dear members of the CCWG-IG,

I want to share this motion that has been put forward to the next GNSO

council meeting which will take place during the ICANN57 meeting.

Best regards

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez

+506 8837 7176

Skype: carlos.raulg

Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)

Forwarded message:

> From: Darcy Southwell <[log in to unmask]>

> To: [log in to unmask] <[log in to unmask]>

> Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering

> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet

> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN

> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:56:30 -0700

>

> Dear Councilors,

>

> Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering

> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet

> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council

> meeting.

>

> Best,

>

> Darcy

>

> __________

>

> Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer

>

> M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart

_______________________________________________

ccwg-internet-governance mailing list

ccwg-internet-governance@icann.org

https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance