Can I please ask our GNSO Councillors to outline their position on the attached motion? I find it rather shocking and my initial reaction is that I hope the motion does not pass, but perhaps you can persuade me otherwise... Thanks.
-------- Original Message --------
Subject: [ccwg-internet-governance] Fwd: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
Local Time: 27 October 2016 2:18 PM
UTC Time: 27 October 2016 13:18
Dear members of the CCWG-IG,
I want to share this motion that has been put forward to the next GNSO
council meeting which will take place during the ICANN57 meeting.
Best regards
Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
Forwarded message:
> Subject: [council] Motion – Withdrawal of the GNSO as a Chartering
> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN
> Date: Wed, 26 Oct 2016 16:56:30 -0700
>
> Dear Councilors,
>
> Attached is a motion for the GNSO to withdraw as a Chartering
> Organization for the Cross Community Working Group to discuss Internet
> governance (CWG-IG) issues affecting ICANN for our November 7 Council
> meeting.
>
> Best,
>
> Darcy
>
> __________
>
> Darcy Southwell | Compliance Officer
>
> M: +1 503-453-7305 │ Skype: darcy.enyeart
_______________________________________________
ccwg-internet-governance mailing list
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/ccwg-internet-governance