Thank you Farzanesh for updates and I will be in meeting. Regards Bikram Shrestha President Internet Society Nepal Sent from my iPhone > On Oct 31, 2016, at 8:11 PM, GZ Kabir <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > 1+ for Farzaneh. > > —Kabir > > >> On Oct 31, 2016, at 4:40 PM, Kleinwächter, Wolfgang <[log in to unmask]> wrote: >> >> Hi, >> >> 1+ for Farzaneh. >> >> I will not come to Hyderabad. For the CCWG-IG session on UN bodies I would recommend to have a look also into the G 20. The Hangzhou document (September 2016) is not bad (http://www.g20.utoronto.ca/2016/160905-digital.html). On December 1, 2016, Germany will take over the G 20 presidency. They plan to have a special IT ministerial meeting early April 2017 in Düsseldorf with a multistakeholder pre-conference. >> >> The G 20 summit is in Hamburg, May 2017. >> >> Wolfgang >> >> >> >> >> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht----- >> Von: NCSG-Discuss im Auftrag von farzaneh badii >> Gesendet: Mo 31.10.2016 06:44 >> An: [log in to unmask] >> Betreff: [NCSG-Discuss] Fwd: Update on CCWG-IG >> >> Hello everybody >> >> Here is an update on the ccwg-IG group in which I represent NCSG. >> >> *A statement:* CCWG-IG recently drafted a statement which related to >> proposals currently being discussed at the World Telecommunications >> Standardization (WTSA 16). >> >> CCWG-IG wrote the statement in response to a proposal by the African >> Telecommunication Union regarding the use of geographic names in generic to >> level domains. The objective of the statement was to remind WTSA >> participants that matters regarding geographic domain names is within ICANN >> mission and it is to be resolved in a bottom-up manner. The statement was >> sent to chartering organizations. >> I also took part in drafting the statement and made some comments. It is >> attached. >> >> *F2F meeting in Hyderabad : *CCWG-IG will have an F2F meeting in Hyderabad. >> It will meet with the Board IG WG. It will also discuss CCWG-IG activities >> and perhaps invites GNSO Council chair to discuss some matters. >> >> *High-interest session of CCWG-IG: *The high-interest session will have two >> segments, one segment focuses on Internet fragmentation, the other focuses >> on various Internet governance related groups at the United Nations. >> >> >> *The ccwg-IG and GNSO Council: * As it has been brought up on the NCSG >> list, GNSO Council has a motion to withdraw from CCWG-IG. This is in light >> of the current uniform framework for CCWG life cycles which GNSO Council >> has approved. https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/files/ >> ccwg-framework-principles-draft-19feb16-en.pdf >> >> If you look at the principles, the CCWG-IG charter does not fit the >> recommendations and principles, one reason is that its mandate is based on >> a continuous mission not a one off mission.What we need to do is to perhaps >> change the CCWG-IG charter and implement it better, and make the group >> focus on certain issues throughout the year as well as having F2F meetings >> and high interest panels. >> >> >> I hope this is helpful. Please look at ICANN schedule o find out the timing >> of the CCWG-IG sessions. >> >> Best >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> >> -- >> Farzaneh >> >> >> >> -- >> Farzaneh