Hi Niels and all, Now the question looks much clearer to me. Also addresses fully the questions I asked earlier. I support the new wording. Cheers Tanya On 2 Nov 2016 08:46, "Niels ten Oever" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Hi all, > > To reconcile the issue Milton has this might be most appropriate: > > 4. What steps is the ICANN board making to implement a Human > Rights Impact Assessment of ICANN's policies and the organization? > > I realized though we might need a bit more background to this questions. > I would like to offer this: > > 4. Following up on the discussion between the NCSG and the Board at the > Marakesh meeting, we would be very interested to hear what steps the > board is making in relation human rights in addition to the > accountability processes. We would like to understand what efforts have > been made and whether you could update us on planed activities > concerning human rights and ICANN's policy processes as well as ICANN > the organization? > > Looking forward to discuss! > > Best, > > Niels > > > > On 11/02/2016 09:56 AM, Niels ten Oever wrote: > > Dear Milton, > > > > You not agreeing on a question doesn't mean we don't have consensus. It > > just means you're trying to block it. > > > > I also have given you two options to accommodate your concerns on which > > you did not reply, nor did you provide argumentation for your issues. So > > this response from you does not seem fair to me. > > > > For you reference, the two alternatives I provided to accommodate your > > concerns: > > > > 4. What steps is the ICANN board making to implement a Human > > Rights Impact Assessment of ICANN the organization? > > > > 4. What steps is the ICANN board making to implement a Human > > Rights Impact Assessment of ICANN the organization and/or its > > policies? > > > > Best, > > > > Niels > > > > > > On 11/02/2016 08:54 AM, Mueller, Milton L wrote: > >> Tapani > >> Sorry, but you need to take this process a lot more seriously. > >> These interactions with the board are very important. You were given > the question suggestions some time ago. Then we got one day to come to > consensus on them. When there was no immediate consensus (predictably) you > unilaterally declared that there was no time to fix them; now you say there > is. > >> > >> Based on the latest comments, I would suggest that we drop Question 3 > (about Human rights). > >> There isn't a consensus on it and it doesn't seem to be the kind of > thing the board will decide, rather it will be worked out on WS2. Once WS2 > is further along and the board is set to make a decision we can frame a > question then. > >> > >> > >>> -----Original Message----- > >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf Of > >>> Tapani Tarvainen > >>> Sent: Tuesday, November 1, 2016 1:29 PM > >>> To: [log in to unmask] > >>> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad? > >>> > >>> Hi Niels, > >>> > >>> I thought the changes over what I posted yesterday (discussed here > today, > >>> from Dave and Milton) were rather trivial, but perhaps I was wrong. In > any > >>> case they haven't been sent yet, and I guess it doesn't really matter > if it takes > >>> one more day. I'm just about to board my next flight so I can't do > much about > >>> it before reaching India, but feel free to debate details until then. > >>> > >>> Tapani > >>> > >>> > >>> > >>> On Nov 01 18:46, Niels ten Oever ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > >>> > >>>> Dear Tapani, > >>>> > >>>> Could you let us know which version of the questions you sent? > >>>> > >>>> If there were last minute changes, whereas we have discussed this > >>>> already for quite a while, I think that would be a bit of a process > issue. > >>>> > >>>> Best, > >>>> > >>>> Niels > >>>> > >>>> On 11/01/2016 06:37 PM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > >>>>> All, > >>>>> > >>>>> I'm sorry, no more time for changes, it's past deadline and I'm off > >>>>> to airport in half an hour so I asked Maryam to send it, hopefully > >>>>> without too many typos left (I asked her to fix any obvious ones). > >>>>> > >>>>> Apologies for leaving this so late, > >>>>> > >>>> > >>>> -- > >>>> Niels ten Oever > >>>> Head of Digital > >>>> > >>>> Article 19 > >>>> www.article19.org > >>>> > >>>> PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 > >>>> 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 > > > > -- > Niels ten Oever > Head of Digital > > Article 19 > www.article19.org > > PGP fingerprint 8D9F C567 BEE4 A431 56C4 > 678B 08B5 A0F2 636D 68E9 >