Seeing no other comments besides the proposal of adding 5th question about travel funding from Raoul, which I won't do for reasons already noted, I will send the questions in now without further changes. > 1. Does the Board continue to agree with Fadi Chehade's position of > Summer 2015 that ICANN does not police content, > https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-is-not-the-internet-content-police > (published by Alan Grogan, ICANN's Chief Contract Compliance Officer)? > Does the Board share our concerns that arrangements like the > MPAA-Donuts agreement are deeply inappropriate for the Domain Name > System? > > 2. In the Whois Complaint process, anonymous people can make > complaints that he data is inaccurate and in some cases cause trouble > for innocent registrants. Why doesn't ICANN ever investigate whether > these allegations are intended to harass or intimidate registrants or > are made for anti-competitive reasons? > > 3. How does the Board expect the the new complaint system to work when > it puts ICANN legal, whose job is to protect the corporation from > complainers whether they are right or wrong, in charge of managing > complaints? Has the Board considered how it affects the independence > of the Ombudsman? As an example of our concerns, why there were no > repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot > Registry case? > > 4. Following up on the discussion between the NCSG and the Board at > the Marrakech meeting (ICANN55), we are very interested to hear what > steps the Board is taking in relation to human rights in addition to > the ongoing accountability processes. What efforts have been made and > what activities are planned in relation to human rights and ICANN's > policy processes as well as ICANN the organization? -- Tapani Tarvainen