I think one relevant question to the board could be along the lines:
5. Why does ICANN think, that supporting corporations' attendance by funding their travel in equal amounts would be justified, as opposed to funding the travel of non-commercial constituencies?
Some background for the question:
Non-com groups are defending and even advancing the rights of all users, including individuals under corporate contracts, whereas the corporations are attending only because they want to lobby for more control and profits for themselves. The corporations already have a financial incentive to attend, so do we really need to make it almost free for them as well? Their representatives also get paid to do the work they're doing, whereas us noncoms don't, apart from some exceptions. Therefore, the balance would STILL be rigged for corporations, but not quite as much. I think this would be a minor, nut justified improvement. To make it remarkable, we could use the saved money to fund more noncoms into joining the workload. Workload, that is mostly made by corporations and governments..
-Raoul