Dear Milton,

Based on my very limited experience of only 1 (last) meeting, where the 
GNSO Futures initiative was developed and later not accepted by the 
NCSG, I have to ask what the purpose of the next meeting would be. What 
are the proposals of the NCSG to keep the conversation alive with the 
rest of the NCPH. If there is no new initiative, I´m afraid that I side 
with Milton on this one.

My 2 cents.

Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
+506 8837 7176
Skype: carlos.raulg
Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
On 23 Nov 2016, at 8:39, Mueller, Milton L wrote:

> Planning these meetings seems to involve a lot more complexity, 
> coordination and debate these days compared to when we started.
>
> Indeed, this is one of the reasons why I am a conscientious objector 
> to the whole intersessional meeting.
> It is not needed, and we are wasting enormous amount of time and 
> energy and eventually money on this.
>
> Dr. Milton L. Mueller
> Professor, School of Public Policy
> Georgia Institute of Technology