In my view is not ICANN Legal either, but ICANN compliance 2 cents Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez +506 8837 7176 Skype: carlos.raulg Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) On 1 Nov 2016, at 15:05, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > Hi Milton, > > Agreed, I was in too much of a hurry, your suggestions for 3 & 4 are > better. > > I also tend to agree with Dave that "ICANN legal" is better than > "ICANN lawyer", makes it look less like a personal attack. > > Tapani > > On Tue, Nov 01, 2016 at 08:37:32AM +0000, Mueller, Milton L > ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > >> Tapani, >> You did a great job of phrasing the first question, which is a highly >> sensitive one, taking lots of input and forming it into a coherent >> question that meets all our concerns. 2nd one works well, too. >> >> The 3rd and 4th questions on the other hand seem to be a bit >> confusing. Can you agree to rephrase them as follows? >> >>> 3. In the Whois Complaint process, anonymous people can make >>> complaints that he data is inaccurate and in some cases cause >>> trouble for innocent registrants. Why doesn't ICANN ever investigate >>> whether these allegations are intended to harass or intimidate >>> registrants or are made for anti- competitive reasons? >>> >>> 4. What steps is the ICANN board is making to implement a Human >>> Rights Impact Assessment of ICANN policies? >>> >> >> >>> -----Original Message----- >>> From: NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] On Behalf >>> Of >>> Tapani Tarvainen >>> Sent: Monday, October 31, 2016 9:30 AM >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> Subject: Re: Topics for meeting with the board in Hyderabad? >>> >>> Collecting and combining topics here's what I came up to ask the >>> board. Way >>> past deadline, have to send it today, if anybody spots glaring >>> errors please let >>> me know ASAP. >>> >>> >>> 1. How does the Board expect the the new complaint system to work >>> when it >>> puts ICANN's lawyer, whose job is to protect the corporation from >>> complainers whether they are right or wrong, in charge of managing >>> complaints? Has the Board considered how it affects the independence >>> of the >>> Ombudsman? As an example of our concerns, why there were no >>> repercussions for the abuses of TLD evaluation procedures in the Dot >>> Registry >>> case? >>> >>> 2. Does the Board continue to agree with Fadi Chehade's position of >>> Summer >>> 2015 that ICANN does not police content, >>> https://www.icann.org/news/blog/icann-is-not-the-internet-content-police >>> (published by Alan Grogan, ICANN's Chief Contract Compliance >>> Officer)? >>> Does the Board share our concerns that arrangements like the >>> MPAA-Donuts >>> agreement are deeply inappropriate for the Domain Name System? >>> >>> 3. The Whois Complaint process and why anonymous people can ask for >>> personal information about registrants. Why ICANN never investigates >>> whether these allegations are intended to harass, intimidate or for >>> anti- >>> competitive reasons? >>> >>> 4. What steps the ICANN board is making and when to implement a >>> Human >>> Rights Impact Assessment of ICANN the organization? >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Tapani Tarvainen