Great idea guys, what did you have in mind for the agenda?

Stephanie
On 2016-12-01 06:41, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote:
>
> +1 Klaus
>
> Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez
> +506 8837 7176
> Skype: carlos.raulg
> Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica)
> On 1 Dec 2016, at 2:00, Klaus Stoll wrote:
>
>     Dear All
>
>     I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making
>     topics as we spend time on the merits of various places around the
>     world to host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about
>     what we need to discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to
>     achieve and how to get there. When we do this, the place might not
>     be of such an importance.
>
>     Yours
>
>     Klaus
>
>     PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely!
>
>
>
>     On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote:
>>     Sam,
>>
>>     I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said
>>     "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14
>>     <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf>
>>     of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type
>>     [locations] into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions,
>>     please, because we can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing
>>     that in." If that instruction was ignored and our representatives
>>     on the call did instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting
>>     a meeting such as this one, I'm not sure who they thought they
>>     were serving.
>>
>>     Ayden Férdeline
>>     linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline>
>>
>>
>>>     -------- Original Message --------
>>>     Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing
>>>     Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM
>>>     UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24
>>>     From: [log in to unmask]
>>>     To: [log in to unmask]
>>>
>>>     In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH
>>>     Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript
>>>     makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last
>>>     minute, and
>>>     some serious and some almost in jest.
>>>
>>>     One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that
>>>     Reykjavik
>>>     remains a front runner.
>>>     The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd.
>>>
>>>     https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf
>>>
>>>     Sam L.
>>
>