Great idea guys, what did you have in mind for the agenda? Stephanie On 2016-12-01 06:41, Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez G. wrote: > > +1 Klaus > > Carlos Raúl Gutiérrez > +506 8837 7176 > Skype: carlos.raulg > Current UTC offset: -6.00 (Costa Rica) > On 1 Dec 2016, at 2:00, Klaus Stoll wrote: > > Dear All > > I wish we would spend as much time and energy on IG policy making > topics as we spend time on the merits of various places around the > world to host an ICANN Intersessional meeting. Can we talk about > what we need to discuss t the meeting, the goals we want to > achieve and how to get there. When we do this, the place might not > be of such an importance. > > Yours > > Klaus > > PS: Kuawi, Hawaii. Definitely! > > > > On 12/1/2016 1:37 AM, Ayden Férdeline wrote: >> Sam, >> >> I don't think it was clear at all that some locations were said >> "almost in jest". What was made clear, however, on page 14 >> <https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150133/transcript_ncphpc_291116.pdf> >> of the transcript, was the instruction to, "Please type >> [locations] into the chat. No tongue in cheek suggestions, >> please, because we can’t see or hear your tone when you're typing >> that in." If that instruction was ignored and our representatives >> on the call did instead suggest cities not well suited to hosting >> a meeting such as this one, I'm not sure who they thought they >> were serving. >> >> Ayden Férdeline >> linkedin.com/in/ferdeline <http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline> >> >> >>> -------- Original Message -------- >>> Subject: Re: NCPH Intersessional timing >>> Local Time: 1 December 2016 12:24 AM >>> UTC Time: 1 December 2016 00:24 >>> From: [log in to unmask] >>> To: [log in to unmask] >>> >>> In response to who made the suggestions for a location for the CGPH >>> Intersession, a review of the session Chat transcript >>> makes it clear that the names were tossed out at the last >>> minute, and >>> some serious and some almost in jest. >>> >>> One gets a sense from the overall records of the meeting, that >>> Reykjavik >>> remains a front runner. >>> The decision is supposed to be out on Friday, Dec 2nd. >>> >>> https://community.icann.org/display/ncph/Planning+-+Intersessional+2017%3A+Call+details%2C+recordings%2C+transcripts?preview=/63144502/63150134/acchat_ncphpc_291116_.pdf >>> >>> Sam L. >> >