Thanks everyone for commenting on this document. We have now resolved all the comments, accepted additions  and it will be submitted to PC for approval. PDF of what we will submit to NCSG PC is attached. 

Farzaneh

On Wed, Jan 18, 2017 at 2:22 PM, Aarti Bhavana <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

The Sidley memo was shared on the IOT mailing list: https://mm.icann.org/pipermail/iot/attachments/20170106/9dcc4fb4/Sidley-ResponsetoCertifiedQuestionofCCWGIRPIoT-January42017-0001.pdf 

Aarti Bhavana | Program Officer

Centre for Communication Governance | National Law University, Delhi | Sector-14, Dwarka, New Delhi - 110078 | Fax: (+91) 11-280-34256 | www.ccgdelhi.org . www.ccgtlr.org . https://ccgnludelhi.wordpress.com/author/aartibhavana/| 

On 18 January 2017 at 22:51, Mueller, Milton L <[log in to unmask]> wrote:

I have incorporated the legal analysis from Sidley Austin LLP into our public comments. Gratifyingly, their legal analysis of the supplementary IRP rules totally supports our concerns about the time limits.
One question for the crowd: I got my hands on the Sidley comments in my email box - are these comments posted anywhere so the NCSG comments can link to them?

Thanks to all of you who contributed to these comments. I have now edited them, accepting most of the amendments proposed by members and adding a title and such. I would ask the Policy Committee to do what it needs to do to conclude the filing of these comments.
https://docs.google.com/document/d/1TMI2n_EgBDVTSUZm2Xwl7SSHWks9Hz076NQGfsXxqso/

Dr. Milton L Mueller
Professor, School of Public Policy
Georgia Institute of Technology
Internet Governance Project
http://internetgovernance.org/