FYI - a revised report of the Independent Review of the Trademark Clearinghouse has been published. I will leave it to Ed or Marília to comment on whether or not they feel that the [NCSG's comments](https://forum.icann.org/lists/comments-tmch-review-25jul16/msg00005.html) were adequately addressed in the report which has (or will be, I am not sure) circulated to the GAC. Thanks. - Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Daily Digest of ICANN.org Local Time: 23 February 2017 11:30 PM UTC Time: 23 February 2017 23:30 From: [log in to unmask] To: Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask]> ICANN Daily Digest of ICANN.org News & Announcements ------ [Revised Report of the Independent Review of the Trademark Clearinghouse Now Available](http://icann.org/news/announcement-2017-02-23-en) LOS ANGELES – 23 February 2017 – The Internet Corporation for Assigned Names and Numbers (ICANN) today published the Revised Report of the Independent Review of the Trademark Clearinghouse. Read the report [PDF, 1.28 MB]. The review was conducted by Analysis Group, a third-party consulting firm. The firm examined whether domains that relate to, but do not exactly match trademarks should be considered for use in the Claims periods of a new generic top-level domain's lifecycle. The review also explores if extending the number of days of the Claims service would be of value and measu... [Read more](http://icann.org/news/announcement-2017-02-23-en) ------ [BROWSE ALL NEWS](http://icann.org/news) This message was sent to [log in to unmask] from: ICANN | 12025 Waterfront Drive Suite 300 | Los Angeles, CA 90094-2536 [Manage Your Subscription](http://icann.org/user/account_setting/edit?section=news)