We should discuss our views on this in the Friday call.
Stephanie Perrin
Subject: | Re: [council] Fwd: CCWG-Accountability WG proposal for a Limited Scope of the ATRT3 Review - reminder |
---|---|
Date: | Tue, 7 Feb 2017 00:13:44 +0000 |
From: | Phil Corwin <[log in to unmask]> |
To: | James M. Bladel <[log in to unmask]>, GNSO Council List <[log in to unmask]> |
FYI,
the BC supports the reduced scope of this upcoming review.
Philip
S. Corwin, Founding Principal
Virtualaw
LLC
1155
F Street, NW
Suite
1050
Washington,
DC 20004
202-559-8597/Direct
202-559-8750/Fax
202-255-6172/Cell
Twitter:
@VlawDC
"Luck
is the residue of design" -- Branch Rickey
From:
[log in to unmask]
[mailto:[log in to unmask]]
On Behalf Of James M. Bladel
Sent: Friday, January 27, 2017 10:57 PM
To: GNSO Council List
Subject: [council] Fwd: CCWG-Accountability WG
proposal for a Limited Scope of the ATRT3 Review -
reminder
Councilors -
Please see the message from CCWG Staff,
below. Most of the SO-AC chairs (myself included) took
this note as informational, and missed the call to action.
In a nutshell, the CCWG co-chairs note
that the upcoming ATRT3 review team will overlap
significantly with the recently completed (Workstream 1)
and ongoing work (Workstream 2) of CCWG-ACCT. Like the
approach to WHOIS2, they are proposing a reduced scope for
this next review to avoid collision/duplication of work.
I'd welcome any comments or thoughts
you might have on this, and we can add it as a discussion
item for our draft agenda for our Council call in
February.
Thank you,
J.
-------------
James Bladel
_____________________________
From: Bernard Turcotte <[log in to unmask]>
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2017 14:41
Subject: CCWG-Accountability WG proposal for a Limited Scope
of the ATRT3 Review - reminder
SO and AC Chairs,
This is a reminder that the
CCWG-Accountability has not received any replies to its
December 2nd proposal (original message below) regarding
the scope of the upcoming ATRT3 review which will be
publishing its call for volunteers by the end of
January.
As stated in the proposal there are
a number of significant overlaps between the work of the
CCWG-Accountability and a standard ATRT review which
would cause an important duplication of work between
these two processes.
The CCWG-Accountability simply wishes
to ensure that the SO's and AC's are aware that if there
is no request from the SO's and AC's to modify the scope
of the ATRT3 review prior to its launch that it will
proceed as a standard review.
The Co-Chairs of the
CCWG-Accountability remain available to the SO's and
AC's for further discussions or answer any questions.
Bernard Turcotte
ICANN Staff Support to the
CCWG-Accountability for
The Co-Chairs of the
CCWG-Accountability.
On Fri, Dec 2, 2016 at 5:07 AM,
Mathieu Weill <[log in to unmask]>
wrote:
Dear SO & AC Chairs,
The CCWG-Accountability (CCWG) at its face to face
meeting at the ICANN 56 in Helsinki considered the
implications of the collision of topics, and
therefore efforts, between ATRT3 and Work Stream 2
(WS2) (please see Annex 1 for a detailed
consideration of this issue).
In its discussion of this issue the CCWG
considered the following points:
· Collision
of topics between WS2 and ATRT3 - There is
potential for significant overlap between WS2
topics and the scope of ATRT3 as 6 of the 9 WS2
topics are accountability and transparency issues
ATRT3 could also consider.
· Timing
of the two activities - WS2 began in July 2016
with an objective of completing its work by the
end of 2017. ATRT3, which is expected to take 12
months to complete, is currently scheduled to
begin in January 2017 but could potentially be
delayed until February 2018 under the new Bylaws
(which require ATRT every 5 years versus the AoC
requirement for every 3 years). It would seem
inefficient, at best, to have both of these
activities working on the same topics
independently, while drawing on the same pool of
community volunteers. At worst, ATRT3 and WS2
groups could issue recommendations that are
conflicting or duplicative.
· Implementation
of recommendations – The Bylaws for WS2 give CCWG
recommendations greater weight when it comes to
board consideration, relative to recommendations
from an ATRT organized under the AoC.
While
in Helsinki, the CCWG concluded its preferred
approach, as communicated in our 8-Aug-2016letter to the Board of
ICANN:
Convene ATRT3 as soon as possible with the limited
scope of assessing implementation of ATRT2
recommendations. Allow WS2 to handle new
recommendations for accountability and
transparency. The fourth ATRT would convene before
2022 and would assess all accountability and
transparency topics and make recommendations
The
ICANN Board
replied to the CCWG letter on 24-Oct-2016,
saying,
It
is not up to the Board to dictate the scope of
this important community review. While we share
the concerns raised of avoiding duplication of
resources, it is essential that the broader ICANN
community have a voice in determining how the
ATRT3 should be scoped in alignment with the
Bylaws. The Board and the ICANN Organization stand
ready to support the community’s direction.
Accordingly,
the CCWG is now proposing to community leadership
the following approach:
• Requesting that
the SO/AC leadership select (following the new
Bylaws) a small group of review team members that
have either participated in or closely tracked
ATRT2.
• Requesting the
ICANN organization to do a "self-assessment"
reporting on a) the extent to which each
recommendation was followed and/or implemented; b)
the effectiveness in addressing the issues
identified by ATRT2; and c) the need for
additional implementation.
• Specifically
request that the Review Team exclude the issues
that are already covered by the
CCWG-Accountability WS2 (see Annex 1).
• Suggesting that
the work be conducted & completed more quickly
than normal, such as asking that the Final Report
be issued within six months
If the suggested approach above is agreeable to
SO/AC community, the next steps would be:
• SO/AC leadership
to issue a public statement or a letter to ICANN
CEO and Board Chair that explains why limited
scope is appropriate and articulates that they
have broad support of the ICANN community
• Call for
Volunteers to note limited scope & unique
expertise sought
• Reach out to
previous ATRT Review Team members and encourage
them to apply for the narrowly-scoped ATRT3 Review
Team
• Propose a
Charter for the ATRT3 Review Team to adopt that
tracks the limited Scope
Best
regards,
Thomas
Rickert, Leon Sanchez & Mathieu Weill
CCWG-Accountability
Co-chairs
_______________________________________________
Acct-Staff mailing list
[log in to unmask]
https://mm.icann.org/mailman/listinfo/acct-staff
No
virus found in this message.
Checked by AVG - www.avg.com
Version: 2016.0.7998 / Virus Database: 4749/13802 - Release
Date: 01/20/17
Internal Virus Database is out of date.