This is serious as this kind of data generation/analytics should be managed by not very complicated software. It will be very interesting to find out why this is not working. best On Thu, Feb 23, 2017 at 8:34 AM, William Drake <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Send a note to Goran > > On Feb 23, 2017, at 02:09, Ayden Férdeline <[log in to unmask] > <[log in to unmask]>> wrote: > > See this email exchange > <http://mm.icann.org/pipermail/atlarge-review-wp/2017-February/000374.html>. > ICANN staff claimed a public document on the ICANN website had been > downloaded zero times since it was uploaded. A member of the At-Large > community corrected the record, noting that they had downloaded that file > several times. I too had downloaded it. So it seems we should be very > careful taking ICANN at its word when it comes to statistics. I cannot help > but think back to last week at the Intersessional when the SVP Contractual > Compliance and Consumer Safeguards spoke about how the Compliance pages > were the most visited on the ICANN website. I hate to be so cynical, but > maybe the analytics function just doesn't work — like much of the ICANN > website? > > - Ayden > > > >