I too am glad that they have hit the stop button on this bad idea. If there is a meeting with PIR in Copenhagen I would like to be involved, to improve the economist:lawyer ratio (maybe). Sam On 2/23/2017 9:42 PM, David Cake wrote: > I knew Phil and the EFF were both concerned about this issue and made > sure they were in contact. I’m glad that we didn’t even get to the > point of having to finish drafting and sign on before it seems to have > had effect! > > The backdown by PIR is very welcome - but as Farzy says, a halt for > now by PIR doesn’t mean this process has stopped entirely, and we need > to really engage with the multi-stakeholder community and understand > our concerns not just with the proposal itself, but the process by > which it was developed. > > I would welcome having a representative of PIR meet with us at an SG > or Constituency meeting in Copenhagen to discuss our concerns. > > David >