Hi Michael, Sounds good. Could you try to formulate that as a question we could ask them? (Any others are of course also welcome to give it a go.) Tapani On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 11:03:31AM -0400, Michael Karanicolas ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > Hi, > > How about one on Board transparency? We've heard calls for that as part of > our subgroup discussions. In particular, we can ask their thoughts about a > requirement that a decision to remove material from Board minutes must be > grounded in one of the exceptions in the DIDP, and that material removed > from minutes should, as far as possible, be scheduled for release after a > particular period of time (to be determined based on the specific > sensitivity of the material). > > Mike > > > On Tue, Mar 7, 2017 at 10:43 AM, Tapani Tarvainen < > [log in to unmask]> wrote: > > > Sounds like we'll only have one question for the board... > > > > Kathy, can you have publishable phrasing for it today? > > > > Anybody else, if you have other questions to suggest, please > > let us know TODAY. Thanks. > > > > Tapani > > > > > > On Mar 02 10:55, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > > > > > Tapani, > > > > > > These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right? I think we > > > should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our > > > efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants, > > > compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and > > > compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community > > > (not a subset). > > > > > > This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain > > > provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about > > > compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the > > > board? (Please respond privately.) > > > > > > Best, Kathy > > > > > > On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > > >Dear all, > > > > > > > >As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking > > > >Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you. > > > > > > > >So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather > > > >impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by > > > >the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated. > > > > > > > >Tapani > > > > > > > >On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ( > > [log in to unmask]) wrote: > > > > > > > >>NCUC members, > > > >> > > > >>Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with > > the > > > >>stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG): > > > >> > > > >>1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in > > > >>CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2? What could the Board or ICANN > > > >>organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of > > this > > > >>work? > > > >>2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group? > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board > > meeting. > > > >> > > > >>This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty > > to > > > >>ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG > > about > > > >>these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer > > our > > > >>input to that thread. > > > >> > > > >>Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our > > > >>questions! > > > >> > > > >>Best > > > >> > > > >> > > > >>Farzaneh > > -- Tapani Tarvainen