+1 besides the following is still an option: *"make ICANN Organization's Human Resources department available to assist in complaints where the complainant has indicated a preference to engage with a person of a different gender than the current Ombudsman."* *Regards* On 28 Mar 2017 07:15, "James Gannon" <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > Quick note, when we were drafting our statement on this I brought up the > fact that a new office or set of resources was never going to be realistic > for the organization to create for these situations. > > While we can agree that yes it would be better to have a separate function > that realistically and commercially that was not going to be an option. > > > > -James > > > > *From:* NCSG-Discuss [mailto:[log in to unmask]] *On Behalf Of > *Corinne Cath > *Sent:* Tuesday, March 28, 2017 12:23 AM > *To:* [log in to unmask] > *Subject:* Re: The anti-harassment policy > > > > Thanks for sharing, Farzi. It is great that it passed. But perhaps someone > can elaborate how the Ombudsperson has (again) become the main mediator in > the event of (alleged) harassment? Especially, after we had long > conversations on the list about finding alternatives to such a centralized > solution. See: http://lists.ncuc.org/pipermail/ncuc-discuss/2016- > November/019562.html > > > > Best, > > > > On Fri, Mar 24, 2017 at 12:14 PM, farzaneh badii <[log in to unmask]> > wrote: > > Hi > > > > > > *ICANN Community Anti-Harassment Policy and Terms of Participation and > Complaint Procedure* > > is posted: https://www.icann.org/resources/pages/community- > anti-harassment-policy-2017-03-24-en > > > > Farzaneh > > > > > > -- > > Corinne J.N. Cath > Ph.D. Candidate, Oxford Internet Institute & Alan Turing Institute > > Web: www.oii.ox.ac.uk/people/corinne-cath > Email: [log in to unmask] & [log in to unmask] > Twitter: @C_Cath >