This is a good letter. I find myself largely in agreement with the Contracted Parties House here, especially in regards to principles 7 (primacy of Policy Development Processes) and 8 (strengthening community feedback processes). It will be interesting to see how ICANN responds. - Ayden -------- Original Message -------- Subject: [CCWG-ACCT] FW: Letter from the Registries and Registrars on Staff Accountability Local Time: 2 March 2017 7:26 PM UTC Time: 2 March 2017 19:26 From: [log in to unmask] To: CCWG Accountability <[log in to unmask]> [All,] I sent this to the Staff Accountability WS2 group, but thought that I would share with the broader community. We expect this letter to be posted on ICANN’s Correspondence page at some point soon. Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask] T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw From: Jeff Neuman Sent: Thursday, March 2, 2017 2:21 PM To: [log in to unmask] Subject: Letter from the Registries and Registrars on Staff Accountability All, Please find enclosed a letter from the Registries and Registrars that relate to our work. Best regards, Jeffrey J. Neuman Senior Vice President |Valideus USA | Com Laude USA 1751 Pinnacle Drive, Suite 600 Mclean, VA 22102, United States E: [log in to unmask] or [log in to unmask] T: +1.703.635.7514 M: +1.202.549.5079 @Jintlaw