Not a question for the Board, but I am wondering if we should ask or write to Göran about [this letter](https://www.icann.org/en/system/files/correspondence/marby-to-csg-22feb17-en.pdf) which he sent the Commercial Stakeholder Group last week. At a minimum, I think we should make it clear that we would like to be involved in “establish[ing this] criteria”. "We acknowledge the concerns you expressed regarding the HIT session on DNS and Content Regulation in Hyderabad, and we will be working with SO/AC Leadership to establish criteria for inclusion of Cross-Community Topics (HITs) on future meeting schedules. We also note your concern about the session, Cross-Community Discussion with Data Protection Commissioners, to be held in Copenhagen. This session was added as a Cross-Community Topic (HIT) after receiving broad support from SO/AC Leadership, most notably, the GAC, GNSO, and ALAC." Ayden Férdeline [linkedin.com/in/ferdeline](http://www.linkedin.com/in/ferdeline) -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: ICANN Copenhagen, questions from and to the Board Local Time: 2 March 2017 5:09 PM UTC Time: 2 March 2017 17:09 From: [log in to unmask] To: [log in to unmask] Hi Kathy, Yes, that's right. I think we should come up with about three questions, there won't be time for more. Tapani On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 10:55:52AM -0500, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > Tapani, > > These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right? I think we should > be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our efforts to seek > fairer compliance actions for registrants, compliance actions that fall > within the scope of ICANN, and compliance actions responsive to the needs of > the whole community (not a subset). > > This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain provide > it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about compliance. Would anyone > else like to help craft a question for the board? (Please respond > privately.) > > Best, Kathy > > On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: > > Dear all, > > > > As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking > > Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you. > > > > So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather > > impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by > > the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated. > > > > Tapani > > > > On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote: > > > > > NCUC members, > > > > > > Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the > > > stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG): > > > > > > 1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in > > > CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2? What could the Board or ICANN > > > organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this > > > work? > > > 2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group? > > > > > > > > > They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting. > > > > > > This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to > > > ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about > > > these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our > > > input to that thread. > > > > > > Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our > > > questions! > > > > > > Best > > > > > > > > > Farzaneh