I think that's a great question Tapani! It gives us insight into what the Board thinks about the Board - and may help us with our decision. Ed Sent from my iPhone > On 7 Mar 2017, at 18:26, Tapani Tarvainen <[log in to unmask]> wrote: > > Not seeing too many questions, how about something different: > > NCPH is in the process of selecting its Board member. > What advice would you give us in what to look for in a candidate? > > I'd be kind of curious to see what they'd say to that... > > Tapani > >> On Tue, Mar 07, 2017 at 04:43:14PM +0200, Tapani Tarvainen ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >> >> Sounds like we'll only have one question for the board... >> >> Kathy, can you have publishable phrasing for it today? >> >> Anybody else, if you have other questions to suggest, please >> let us know TODAY. Thanks. >> >> Tapani >> >> >>> On Mar 02 10:55, Kathy Kleiman ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >>> >>> Tapani, >>> >>> These are questions for the Board/NCSG Meeting, right? I think we >>> should be asking questions about Compliance -- and continue our >>> efforts to seek fairer compliance actions for registrants, >>> compliance actions that fall within the scope of ICANN, and >>> compliance actions responsive to the needs of the whole community >>> (not a subset). >>> >>> This is definitely not the right phrasing yet, but we can certain >>> provide it. I know Ayden and Raoul have been thinking about >>> compliance. Would anyone else like to help craft a question for the >>> board? (Please respond privately.) >>> >>> Best, Kathy >>> >>>> On 3/2/2017 8:05 AM, Tapani Tarvainen wrote: >>>> Dear all, >>>> >>>> As time is running short, I'll take the liberty of hijacking >>>> Farzaneh's message from NCUC list - thank you. >>>> >>>> So, questions below for all NCSG members. The deadline is rather >>>> impossible, but I don't expect sky to fall if we extend it by >>>> the weekend. Nonetheless quick comments would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Tapani >>>> >>>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2017 at 07:57:57AM -0500, farzaneh badii ([log in to unmask]) wrote: >>>>> >>>>> NCUC members, >>>>> >>>>> Board has requested to answer the below questions for its meeting with the >>>>> stakeholder groups ( I think NCSG): >>>>> >>>>> 1. To what degree is your membership actively participating in >>>>> CCWG-Accountability Work Stream 2? What could the Board or ICANN >>>>> organization do to facilitate participation and timely completion of this >>>>> work? >>>>> 2. What policy/advice issues are top priorities for your group? >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> They also want to know what we want to ask them during NCSG/Board meeting. >>>>> >>>>> This meeting will take place at the NCSG level but I took the liberty to >>>>> ask you and trigger the discussion. If discussions take place on NCSG about >>>>> these questions and our questions to the Board, then we shall transfer our >>>>> input to that thread. >>>>> >>>>> Board has generously given us a deadline of 3 March for submitting our >>>>> questions! >>>>> >>>>> Best >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Farzaneh