Avri, Removing a director, or the whole darn board, is a blend of ex post action and a warning to directors about director behavior. But it falls well short of the kind of ongoing board accountability that is exercised by shareholders in a for-profit organization. I am NOT suggesting a move to shareholders. We do have to keep the ongoing board accountability issue alive in our concerns. Sam L. On 3/8/2017 10:46 AM, avri doria wrote: > On 08-Mar-17 10:40, Sam Lanfranco wrote: >> In short, the core issue is how to actually make the ICANN board >> subject to ongoing accountability to its stakeholders. Making elected >> board members responsible to their constituencies would barely scratch >> the surface of that problem. > isn't that the purpose of the ability of the ICANN EC to remove a director? > > avri > > --- > This email has been checked for viruses by Avast antivirus software. > https://www.avast.com/antivirus -- ------------------------------------------------ "It is a disgrace to be rich and honoured in an unjust state" -Confucius 邦有道,贫且贱焉,耻也。邦无道,富且贵焉,耻也 ------------------------------------------------ Dr Sam Lanfranco (Prof Emeritus & Senior Scholar) Econ, York U., Toronto, Ontario, CANADA - M3J 1P3 email: [log in to unmask] Skype: slanfranco blog: https://samlanfranco.blogspot.com Phone: +1 613-476-0429 cell: +1 416-816-2852